Immigration Visa Attorney Blog

Earlier this month the Obama administration announced it was going to try and tweak the process surrounding federal immigration law in the hopes of positively impacting thousands of American families. It is a story our readers in Troy, Michigan and Columbus, Ohio should follow closely.

As announced by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Director Alejandro Mayorkas, the change involves how undocumented immigrants with American family members will be able to apply for a green card. Undocumented immigrants would be able to remain in the U.S. while waiting for the visa application process to be completed.

Under current law U.S. citizens can submit green card applications for spouses and children, whether or not those family members entered the country legally.

However, as it currently stands, in most cases those family members have to return to their home country to receive their visas. But leaving the country triggers an automatic policy where they cannot return to the U.S. for upwards of a decade, even if they are eligible to become legal resident.

The new proposal provides that undocumented immigrants receive a waiver before leaving the country to get their visa. The idea is that this will cut down on delays for their return.

Continue reading "A more sensible path to green card?" »

In a down economy with higher unemployment, it is easy for programs like H-1B to be cast as standing in the way of Americans finding new and higher paying jobs. Our readers here in Columbus, Ohio have heard us challenge that narrative on a number of occasions.

And that is why a recently released study by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research has the potential to be of significant benefit in terms of public opinion on the issue.

AEI's study contains a number of eye-opening findings, foremost among them that an average of 262 new jobs for Americans can be linked to every 100 foreign-born workers graduating from U.S. universities with advanced degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). The study looked at the eight-year period between 2000 and 2007.

"Immigrants with advanced degrees boost employment for US natives," the report says in its executive summary.

Continue reading "Columbus, OH Attorney: Study Details Benefit of Skilled Immigrants to Job Creation" »

An immigration case that has been featured prominently in the news over the past week highlights some of the issues currently plaguing our system. This should help illustrate for our readers here in Ohio just how damaged the investor visa program is at this point.

ABC World News last week reported on the story of 22-year old Israeli national Amit Aharoni. Aharoni, a graduate of Stanford Business School, was able to land more than $1.65 million in capital to launch an online company that helped customers book cruises

Aharoni's company, CruiseWise.com, already employed nine Americans and was mentioned by Business Insider as one of the country's hottest startups. Aharoni said his hope was that CruiseWise could create hundred of jobs in the San Francisco area.

Continue reading "Columbus, OH Attorney: A disturbing visa case gets national attention" »

Earlier this month the "Council on Jobs and Competitiveness" - a group the president charged with looking at ways to stimulate the economy - officially released its suggestions. The council is comprised of a number of business experts, including GE head Jeffrey Immelt and high-ranking executives at Facebook and AOL.

The approximately 50-page report touches on a number of areas, one being the oft-debated and highly contentious issue of immigration reform.

The council suggests that the United States needs to do a better job keeping the world's most talented immigrant entrepreneurs within its borders so the next Google or Intel is not created elsewhere. The report asks the question: "Will the next generation of great companies be started in China and South Korea - or will existing barriers to entry be modified so foreign-born entrepreneurs can create those companies in California and South Carolina?"

Continue reading "Columbus, Ohio immigration attorney questions whether Obama's job council on the right track " »

In recent weeks our office has been getting a number of inquiries into the EB-5 program. We thought this would be a good opportunity to review some recent information related to the program.

As many of you are aware, EB-5 is an immigration investor visa program that was created as part of the Immigration Act of 1990. It grants lawful permanent residence to foreign nationals who invest $1 million into a U.S. business that either creates or preserves ten American jobs.

There are other components to EB-5, such as a $500,000 category for investment into so-called Regional Centers, Targeted Employment Area (TEA) areas where unemployment is at least 150 percent the national average, or in rural areas. In recent years much of the EB-5 visas have been centered around the real estate industry, but the visas impact other industries such as clean technology and finance.

Continue reading "EB-5: The Latest" »

We've discussed the EB-5 visa in this blog on a number of occasions. Since we've recently been receiving calls in our Columbus and Troy, Michigan offices about the investor program we thought it made sense to revisit it again.

First, a refresher about EB-5 for those not familiar with the program: The EB-5 investor visa is an immigration preference, meaning those who qualify are eligible to stay in the United States permanently.

The EB-5 is available to those who invest at last $1 million in a U.S. business that employs at least ten citizens or otherwise authorized workers. The investment amount comes down to $500,000 if the investment is made in a "targeted employment area," which refers to certain economically depressed regions.

Another component of EB-5 is the Regional Center Pilot Program. This is a more hands-off option, allowing the investor to contribute to a center already dedicated to the promotion of economic growth and job creation. The same financial commitment is present, but the requirements in terms of job creation are not in play.

In recent years a bill has been making its way through Congress that would introduce a branch from the EB-5 program. The "Startup Visa Act"
is a law introduced with bipartisan support that would create a new EB-6 category.

Continue reading "Could an off-shoot to EB-5 be on the way?" »

One of the hottest immigration topics over the past few weeks is the administration's announcement that it plans to change how it treats the hundreds of thousands of deportation cases currently in the system. For good reason this has stirred controversy from both sides of the political isle as people try to make sense of what the policy will mean.

And though we realize most of our readers are not involved with an active deportation case, it's important to look at the change as it may impact the speed of the federal system as a whole. How the government elects to allocate resources could have an affect on the entire immigration system.

First, some quick background: On Aug. 18 the administration announced it would be reviewing the deportation cases already within the system -- more than 300,000 in total -- with the goal of prioritizing those involving felony cases. The idea being that with limited financial and legal resources the most efficient way to attack the backlog problem is to target those situations most likely to pose a threat to the community.

Continue reading "The administration changes course on deportation: What does it mean? " »

Last month the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) director Alejandro Mayorkas and Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano unveiled changes to policy and operation the federal government hopes will increase foreign investments and help spur job creation. The moves have been praised in many circles as step in the right direction.

Although the government still hasn't addressed lingering issues with the current system it's worth making note of what to expect with these changes. It's very possible our friends in the Ohio and Michigan area could be impacted.

Though no law has been changed, a few significant differences will come in the operation of three categories -- H-1B, EB-5 and EB-2.

With H-1B, USCIS has updated its FAQs with the clarification that a "beneficiary who is the sole owner of the petitioning company may establish a valid employer-employee relationship for the purposes of qualifying for an H-1B visa."

Continue reading "Will the USCIS Job Growth Visa Initiative Make a Difference? " »

Sometimes family members get left out of the immigration process. Costs, logistics, family obligations and other inconveniences can prevent a family member from coming to the United States.

There's no need to worry, though, United States Immigration officials have anticipated this situation. We'd like our friends here in Columbus to make sure they're aware of a potentially helpful tool.

Following to join allows a spouse or child of a principal immigrant to immediately obtain a visa to immigrate to the United States any time after the principal immigrant becomes a lawful permanent resident of the United States. There are, though, some major limitations of following to join.

Following to join is only available to immigrants in categories that give derivative status to spouses and children. Such categories include family-preference immigrants and employment-based immigrants. Further, following to join only applies to preexisting spouses and children. Spouses and children added after an immigrant becomes a permanent resident cannot follow to join. Finally, children can "age out" of eligibility to follow to join.

In spite of the above limitations following to join is far more versatile than one might think. A family member that is following to join doesn't have to literally follow the principal immigrant to the United States. Spouses and children that are inside the United States as nonimmigrants can "follow to join" and adjust status through a principal immigrant, even if they precede the principal immigrant in entrance into the United States.

Considering its limitations, following to join is not for everybody. That being said, following to join is still a valuable and important part of the immigration toolbox. Using following to join to immediately obtain an immigrant visa for a spouse or child is an excellent way to avoid the long waits that can be associated with family based immigrant petitions.

Recently the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) rolled out a new program it hopes will help improve delivery of some documents related to the immigration process. Obviously this could prove to be a significant upgrade for anybody in the local community who deals with the department in an official and time-sensitive capacity.

In a May 2 memo the USCIS said it had put in place what it calls a "Secure Mail Initiative" (SMI). The SMI will take advantage of the Priority Mail with delivery confirmation option within the U.S. Postal Services (USPS).

The USCIS has essentially partnered with the USPS in an effort to allow customers the ability to keep on top of the status of paperwork critical to travel and employment authorization.

Permanent Resident cards (green cards), Employment Authorization (EADs) and Advance Parole can all now be tracked through the SMI. Obviously timely receipt of green cards and EADs will be very important to some of our readers.

The USCIS highlighted two key benefits in its memo:

-Tracking the status of documents with USPS tracking information.

-Increases in the speed documents are received by the USCIS. The memo said that "on average, documents sent through USPS Priority Mail should arrive two to four business days sooner than with first-class mail."

A signature is not required for SMI delivery, so it will still be possible for a piece of mail to be lost - only the delivery of the package or envelope is recorded. But given that the USPS keeps a record of each delivery, the USPS's customer service can be utilized for inquiries.

The USCIS said that customers who receive an approval notice (Form I-797) should contact its Customer Service Center and request tracking information for their particular documents.They will then be given their most recent delivery status and a tracking number. Their document can then be monitored on the USPS's website, usps.com.

Continue reading "USCIS Unveils 'Secure Mail' Initiative" »

Readers of this blog are aware Shihab & Associates supports reforming immigration, specifically lifting the cap on visa programs like H-1B. We feel the United States and its economy will benefit in numerous ways from the addition of more of these kinds of skilled workers.

A component of the visa debate that seems to get less discussion has to do with the families the workers bring to the U.S. To that end, the nonprofit National Foundation for American Policy (NFAP) released a policy brief last month entitled: "The Impact of the Children of Immigrants on Scientific Achievement in America."

The brief focused on the Intel Science Talent Search, a 69-year old research competition that allows high school seniors to present original scientific research. Each year a small group of students are chosen as finalists, with the top-three awarded prizes totaling more than $225,000.

NFAP found that "while only 12 percent of the U.S. population is foreign-born, 70 percent of the finalists in the 2011 (Intel competition) were the children of immigrants." Additionally, 60 percent of the 40 finalists were children of parents who entered the country on H-1B visas, despite former H-1B holders making up less than one percent of the country's population.

China was the country of origin for 16 of the finalists, with ten hailing from India, one from Iran and one from South Korea. The information came from a series of interviews and follow-up interviews conducted by NFAP.

Continue reading "Study Shows Children of Immigrants Among America's Brightest." »

As readers of this blog are aware, we're of the opinion the H-1B program is a flawed system. (Read our recent four-part analysis of H-1B HERE, HERE, HERE and HERE.) Last week a key member of the United States House of Representatives offered one way to attack the situation.

During a March 31 hearing before the House Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) brought up the possibility of limiting the number of professions which qualify for H-1B status. The thinking for Smith, the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, was that giving more visas to technology businesses might be the best option in the current political climate.

Smith's suggestion seems to stem from a feeling that increasing the number of H-1B visas from its current 85,000 annual cap may not be realistic.

Recent congresses have been unwilling to address small portions of the immigration issues before comprehensive immigration reform has taken place. At this point it is not known what the current Congress would support.

So while roughly half of the H-1B visas are used for tech positions such as computer programmers and IT specialists, the rest are used in industries related to fields like fashion and photography. Smith's feeling is that given the potential job-creation benefits associated with tech fields, they may be more important to the country's economy.

"There is nothing wrong with these occupations," Smith said, adding "but I'm not sure that (they) are as crucial to our success in the global economy as are computer scientists."

If other occupations are no longer eligible for H-1B, then more visas would be available for the tech industry. Focusing on scientists and engineers, Smith argued, could be a solution to the program.

Continue reading "Columbus, OH Attorney: Congressman Suggests Change to H-1B Program" »

Here's another recent Department of Labor appeal case for those in the community to take a look at. This one involves analysis of how exactly we define experience when it comes to time on the job vs. time in school.

In April of 2009 a Certifying Officer (CO) denied an employer's request for Permanent Employer Certification (PERM) for the position of Product Manager on two separate grounds. One reason was the alien did not meet the minimum experience for the position under the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).

Under CFR the minimum qualification for the position is a "Bachelor's Degree in Merchandising and five years experience in the field or equivalent combination of education and experience." It was that piece of regulation the CO cited when making the denial.

In a request for reconsideration on May 1, 2009, the employer argued that the alien had "one year of university credit" and had been on the job for 14 ½ years. The employer felt the year of education and job experience was enough to equal 17 years of overall experience.

On February 18 of 2010 the CO denied certification. The CO pointed to a 1994 policy guideline on certification in which a bachelor's degree is listed as equivalent to two years of experience. That would mean a Bachelor's degree and five years of experience would be equal to seven years in the work place, not 17.

That meant the employer's formula was not "substantially equivalent" to the primary requirements of the job.

The case was turned over to a judge with the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals. After outlining the way the PERM process is supposed to function - "exacting" rather than drawn-out - the judge would ultimately find for the CO.

Continue reading "Columbus, OH Attorney: BALCA Looks at Work Experience" »

The saga of Tri Valley University and founder Susan Su is an eye-opener to one way the immigration and educational systems can be exploited and how students can be caught in the middle. We hope folks here in Columbus take a close look at the case.

In January the United States government seized property owned by Susan Su, director of Tri Valley University (TVU), due to allegations related to fraud and other illegal activity. In forfeiture proceedings where typically the properties are the named defendants, the U.S.government asserts that the properties were acquired with illegal funds. The government asked the court to turn over the property due to misuse of visas and permits, mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering. Court documents outline the alleged offenses which occurred during an elaborate defrauding scheme between 2008 and 2010.

In April of 2008, Susan Su created TVU, an entity that supposedly offered online college classes. The government's complaint explains that while the private learning institution was seeking accreditation from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), students were already being recruited and tuition was being paid. In reality the existence of the university was purely for fraudulent purposes.

The focus of TVU was to gain foreign immigrant students by securing F-1 visas. TVU was developed as an illegal institution that allowed foreign nationals to immigrate to the United States and be considered "students" as long as $2,700 "semester" fees were paid. DHS's explanation for not identifying the scheme is that the current immigration system is inadequate for tracking the educational status of foreign nationals. The reason DHS offers for not catching the scheme exonerates the students, who appear to be the true victims of DHS's failures and the school's alleged fraud.

The complaint asserts the first offense committed by TVU and Su was a willing misuse of the visa program. Throughout the accreditation process TVU completed federal documents using inaccurate information in order to circumvent Homeland Security. To receive accreditation by the DHS, TVU had to submit a Form I-17 petition. Su and her staff misled the government by claiming they were operating a legitimate school.

The second offense that occurred was mail fraud. In addition to filling out federal documents, TVU had to supply DHS with three articulation statements from major universities asserting credits earned at TVU would be transferable to larger learning institutions. Mail fraud occurred when TVU sent the fraudulent documents and statements to DHS through the U.S. Postal Service.

Continue reading "Immigration Attorney Examines Tri Valley University Case" »

Those residents of our local Columbus, OH community interested in being granted U.S. citizenship should make sure they are familiar with all parts of the process. An area which usually raises questions is continuity of residency.

To be eligible for Naturalization a lawful permanent resident needs to reside continuously in the U.S. for at least five years, or three years if married to a U.S. citizen and having lived with that same U.S. citizen during the entire residency.

The continuity of residence requirement needs to be met before filing a naturalization application.

Generally speaking, traveling outside the U.S. for less than six months does not interrupt continuous residence. But traveling outside the country for more than six months does raise a presumption that continuity of residence has been interrupted.

Such presumption can be rebutted by providing evidence to establish continuous residence, such as presence of immediate family in the U.S., non-termination employment in the U.S. or retention of full access to a U.S. home.

The burden of proof rests with the applicant. In cases where an applicant left the country to study abroad after they became a permanent resident, the courts have ruled that such study does not result in abandonment of residency. Li v. Chertoff, 490 F.Supp.2d 130 (D. Mass. 2007).

Continue reading "Continuity of Residence Requirement for Naturalization Application" »