Immigration Visa Attorney Blog

We wanted to make sure you were aware of an interesting piece of legislation that was recently introduced by two members of the U.S. Senate.

In May, Senators Lamar Alexander, a Republican from Tennessee and Chris Coons, a Democrat from Delaware, introduced Senate Bill 3192, which carries the title: "Sustaining our Most Advanced Researchers and Technology (SMART) Jobs Act of 2012.

According to the authors, SB 3192 is designed to create a path for non-citizens who earn a masters or doctoral degree in a STEM field from an American university to remain in the country for up to a year while they search for employment related to their field of expertise. Once they have received employment, they would be eligible for a green card. Additionally, these STEM-specific green cards would not count towards any caps or limits already in place.

Continue reading "Senate Bill 3192" »

This week the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that it had reached the cap for H-1B petitions in FY 2013. Any petitions received by USCIS on or after June 12 will be rejected.

"June 11, 2012, was the final receipt date for new H-1B specialty occupation petitions requesting an employment start date in FY 2013," the USCIS said in a release.

With the cap season opening on April 2, that means the 85,000 (65,000 regular, 20,000 advanced degree) cap number was reached in approximately ten weeks. This is a significant change from FY 2012, which the cap wasn't filled until late November.

A number of factors explain the increase in H-1B interest this fiscal, first and foremost being a slight improvement in the U.S. economy and the resulting boost in hiring. As we've mentioned before in this space, as the country emerges from its slow-down, companies have been deciding to invest in infrastructure and are making H-1B-heavy areas like information technology a priority.

Continue reading "H-1B Cap Reached" »

As of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services' (USCIS) May 18 report, there have been 42,000 regular (65,000) cap-eligible petitions received. Additionally the USCIS has received 16,000 petitions for the advanced degree, or 20,000, cap category.

In USCIS' previous May 11 report the cap numbers stood at 36,700 (regular) and 14,800 (advanced), respectively.

This May 18 report is the seventh of the fiscal year for USCIS. If the current rate of filing continues, the FY2013 seems likely to continue for approximately 4 or 5 more weeks.

Continue reading "H-1B FY2013 Update" »

Here is a quick update regarding H-1B cap-eligible petitions for fiscal year 2013.

As of the May 4 report, the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) had received 32,500 petitions for the 65,000 (regular) cap and 13,7000 petitions for the 20,000 (advanced degree) cap. This is the fifth update of the fiscal year, with petitions having been accepted starting on April 2.

In USCIS' previous (April 27) update, the cap numbers stood at 29,200 for regular petitions and 12,300 for advanced degree petitions.

At this point in FY2013, the numbers indicate that filings are being accepted at a rate of approximately 3,500 per week for the regular cap and 1,300 per week for the advanced degree cap. We believe that this rate should continue for the next month or so.

Continue reading "Update For H-1B Cap-Subject Petitions" »

The Press Trust of India (PTI) is reporting that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) received 22,000 H-1B applications in the first four days of Fiscal Year 2013.

A spokesperson for USCIS said the government has received "approximately 22,000 H-1B petitions" since FY 2013 began on April 2. The spokesperson emphasized to PTI that the numbers are preliminary.

The 22,000 figure counts petitions filed for both the regular (65,000) and advanced degree (20,000) caps.

This number marks a significant increase in first week H-1B petitions over the past few years. If accurate, 22,000 would be highest number of early applications since 2009, when USCIS received 42,000 during the first week.

The U.S. Department of State is expected to retrogress the cutoff for Employment-Based Second Preference (EB-2) for India and China to August 2007. The change could come as early as the May bulletin.

This comes from comments made last month by Charles Oppenheim, who is the Chief of the Visa Control and Reporting Division for the State Department. Oppenheim mentioned August 2007 as a likely point of retrogression, but did not rule out cut-off dates being retrogressed more than projected. Currently the priority date is May 1, 2010.

Continue reading "'Significant' Retrogression of EB-2 Priority Could Come Next Month" »

Last week the Department of Homeland Security announced that it had designated the nation of Syria for Temporary Protected Status (TPS). This will be in effect for 18 months and will be reviewed again before the end of that period.

Additional details will be forthcoming from Homeland Security as to who qualifies and exactly how to work through the application process. In the meantime this would be an ideal time for Syrians in the Columbus, Ohio area to seek out assistance from an experienced immigration attorney.

Homeland Security uses the TPS designation in situations where conditions in a foreign country make it unsafe for a foreign national to return safely. Cases like civil war and environmental disaster are common reasons the designation is used by the U.S. government. If foreign nationals are found eligible for TPS they can obtain employment authorization (EAD), can be granted traveling privileges and are not removable from the U.S.

In the case of Syria, the concern is over a citizen uprising related to President Bashar al-Assad. According to the United Nations, more than 9,000 people have died since the so-called Arab Spring made its way to the country in 2011. Currently there are concerns about military snipers targeting unarmed civilians including small children.

Continue reading "Syria Granted Temporary Protected Status" »

A recent report on the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) paints a disturbing picture of the how the organization charged with overseeing lawful immigration in this country operates. We feel it provides some useful insight for our readers and clients in Columbus, Ohio and Troy, Michigan.

In a report dated November 22, auditors from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said that a $1.7 billion project to modernize operations at USCIS has been plagued by unreliability related to cost and planning.

In late 2008 USCIS awarded a technology and services project to IBM that was supposed to "move the agency to a new centralized and consolidated electronic environment that will enable faster, more efficient and accurate immigration benefits determination and processing." The contract was initially given $491.1 million in options for five years.

Continue reading "Columbus, OH attorney on report of USCIS mismanagement" »

Wednesday the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services announced that the H-1B visa cap number for FY 2012 has been reached.

The final receipt date for cap-subject H-1B petitions was Nov. 22, meaning new applications will not be considered. The USCIS said only petitions physically received by that date will be evaluated; postmark dates do not impact the process.

H-1B's regular cap number of 65,000 was the number reached Tuesday. The 20,000 cap master's exemption was attained in October.

The Nov. 22 date represents an almost two-month difference from FY2011. The regular cap for the previous fiscal year was reached on Jan. 26.

The USCIS' release stated that the following non-cap petitions are still being accepted:

-to extend the amount of time a current H-1B worker may remain in the U.S.;
-to change the terms of employment for current H-1B workers;
-to allow current H-1B workers to change employers; and
-to allow current H-1B workers to work concurrently in a second H-1B position.

The Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA) recently ruled on a case related to the confirmation of an employer's sponsorship of a foreign worker. We think it is an interesting decision, one that our friends here in central Ohio should pay attention to as they work on these kinds of application.

Four years ago a company filed for Permanent Employment Certification (PERM) for a landscaping/grounds keeping-related position. The Certifying Officer (CO) in the case denied the application on the grounds that they could not verify the employer's sponsorship of the candidate.

When applying, the Employer included a signed "declaration under of penalty of perjury" from the company president attesting to the conditions of employment. In the denial, the CO stated it tried unsuccessfully to reach the president by phone on five separate occasions over a one-month period.

Continue reading "PERM Judge rules on telephone verification " »

A few years back this blog touched on a few of the specifics connected with extending an H-1B visa beyond six years. Given how many of our clients here in the Columbus, Ohio community work closely with the visa we thought another look at this aspect would be helpful.

What is the history of 7th year H-1B extension?

Prior to 2000, if a foreign national here on an H-1B visa could not reach I-485 (permanent resident) status within six year they were required to leave the U.S. What would often happen is that delays in the permanent residence application process meant H-1B visa holders would reach the end of their six years before completion. Since the situation meant employers often lost the investment they had made in skilled employees, Congress elected to introduce AC21.

What is AC21?

In 2000 Congress passed the "American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act," or AC21. Among other things, AC21 allowed for H-1B workers to begin working for a new employer upon filing the petition instead of waiting for approval. It also provided the ability to extend the H-1B visa beyond six years if an ongoing PERM Labor Certification began at least 365 days prior to the end of the sixth year.

Continue reading "FAQ: H-1B Extensions Beyond Six Years (Part I) " »

One of the hottest immigration topics over the past few weeks is the administration's announcement that it plans to change how it treats the hundreds of thousands of deportation cases currently in the system. For good reason this has stirred controversy from both sides of the political isle as people try to make sense of what the policy will mean.

And though we realize most of our readers are not involved with an active deportation case, it's important to look at the change as it may impact the speed of the federal system as a whole. How the government elects to allocate resources could have an affect on the entire immigration system.

First, some quick background: On Aug. 18 the administration announced it would be reviewing the deportation cases already within the system -- more than 300,000 in total -- with the goal of prioritizing those involving felony cases. The idea being that with limited financial and legal resources the most efficient way to attack the backlog problem is to target those situations most likely to pose a threat to the community.

Continue reading "The administration changes course on deportation: What does it mean? " »

Late last month the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services released the most recent count for its H-1B visa. These numbers represent what the USCIS has received since the the FY2012 schedule began in April.

As of July 22 there have been 21,600 regular petitions accepted by the USCIS out of a total cap of 65,000. That is an increase of 1,000 from the previous week's total.

The Master's Exemption category has had 13,300 petitions accepted out of hits total cap number of 20,000. On July 15 the USCIS reported 12,800 petitions were accepted for this advanced degrees category.

These numbers are somewhat low, perhaps reflecting the economy's sluggish recovery. The positive is that it means there is still ample opportunity to qualify for a visa that begins in October of this year.

A Form-129 needs to be completed in the most complete manner possible for an applicant to have his or her best chance for the petition to be approved. Because of the emphasis the process places on accuracy we recommend seeking experienced counsel for help working through the forms.

Here is some of the most recent information regarding the controversy surrounding Indian IT giant Infosys. The actions of a large company based overseas may not initially seem relevant to the average employer or worker here in Columbus, but the way Infosys may or may not have manipulated the U.S. immigration systems could certainly have ramifications at home.

In May an attorney employed by Infosys named Jack Palmer Jr. filed a civil suit alleging his superiors at the company tried to get him to circumvent U.S. regulations regarding visas. Additionally, Palmer claimed that when he informed his employer of illegal activity it did nothing to correct the problem.

The result of Palmer coming forward is that federal prosecutors are currently assembling a case against Infosys. So far Infosys has not publicly responded to the charges, though it denied Palmer's claims in court filings. Late last month the company filed a motion compelling arbitration in the case, the result of which would be to have the case heard behind closed doors.

In his suit Palmer alleges that Infosys wanted him to help them "creatively" navigate around restrictions put in place to make acquiring H-1B visas more time-consuming. According to Palmer Infosys made the decision to use B-1 visas - easier to obtain but used primarily for shorter visits - to game the system.

Infosys, Palmer says, asked him to write letters on behalf of the workers to be used in the B-1 application process. In those letters he was to state the employees were only visiting for short periods of time, when the truth was they had full-time employment waiting in the U.S.

Palmer refused to write the letters, after which he says he was told he was "not being 'a team player.'"

Continue reading "Columbus, OH Attorney Updates the Infosys Investigation" »

This is another interesting decision handed down recently by the Board of Alien Labor Certification Appeals (BALCA). In May the Department of Labor's appeals arm handled a case which spoke to the importance of clearly providing evidence for why local recruitment efforts came up short. For our friends in and around Columbus it is yet another instance of why expert counsel is so critical in the employment certification process.

In September of 2007 a company filed an Application for Alien Employment Certification for a position titled "Software Engineer." According to the Employer, the position required a Master's degree in Computer Science and either two years experience in the specific job offered or a "suitable combination of education, training, or experience."

Later that year a Certifying Officer (CO) issued an audit that requested all recruitment documentation, including a report required by the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). The response from the Employer stated that two candidates were evaluated for the position. But based on the resumes submitted, their experience with respect to key web-related software "indicated a serious gap in the skill sets required to meet the goals and objectives of the company."

In September of 2009 the Employer's request was denied by the CO on five separate grounds. The CO felt the recruitment report made only a "generalized statement" about the U.S. workers not meeting the position's minimum requirements. A failure to include an "unaltered" copy of the notice of filing, wage determination and web advertisement was listed, as were three cases where the Employer's paperwork was inconsistent or lacking a requisite piece of information.

In October the Employer requested reconsideration. With that request the Employer attached an amended report explaining its rejections of the two U.S. candidates, as well as information clearing up the issues with its paperwork.

And while in June of 2010 the CO found the information regarding wage determination and job order to be acceptable, they still did not find the recruitment report met C.F.R. standards. The CO stated it did not even consider the amended recruitment report.

Continue reading "BALCA: Local Recruiting and Labor Certification" »